Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive Feb 2021 - Revision history

imported>Margotbean: category

2023-01-01T19:29:53Z

imported>Margotbean: Replace template link with boldface

2022-12-24T20:50:35Z

Replace template link with boldface

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 24 December 2022
Line 802:		Line 802:

	If anyone has the technical know-how to change the coding on the infobox it may be more clear to have them marked as inedible there, but I don't know how to do so.		If anyone has the technical know-how to change the coding on the infobox it may be more clear to have them marked as inedible there, but I don't know how to do so.
	:An immediate fix is to use -300, which is how inedible is handled in game code; see [[Template:Edibility]]. Inedible is supposed to work, but there’s an error somewhere in [[Template:Infobox fish]]. I was about to do a major update to Infobox_fish in the next day or so, at which point I’ll make sure the bug is fixed properly. [[User:Nebulous Maestress\|Nebulous Maestress]] ([[User talk:Nebulous Maestress\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)		:An immediate fix is to use -300, which is how inedible is handled in game code; see '''Template:Edibility'''. Inedible is supposed to work, but there’s an error somewhere in [[Template:Infobox fish]]. I was about to do a major update to Infobox_fish in the next day or so, at which point I’ll make sure the bug is fixed properly. [[User:Nebulous Maestress\|Nebulous Maestress]] ([[User talk:Nebulous Maestress\|talk]]) 20:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

	== Slime egg page broken ==		== Slime egg page broken ==

imported>Margotbean: /* New page with fake information; creator keeps blanking the talk page */ fix links

2022-02-16T20:05:42Z

New page with fake information; creator keeps blanking the talk page: fix links

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 16 February 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== New page with fake information; creator keeps blanking the talk page ==		== New page with fake information; creator keeps blanking the talk page ==

	The page [[Ferngill Republic]] has been created by [[User:JimmyProvince]], but there's no proof that the information is real, and they keep blanking the ~~[[Talk:Ferngill Republic\|~~talk page]] after asking for credible sources. [[User:TurkeyInFrenchBread\|TurkeyInFrenchBread]] ([[User talk:TurkeyInFrenchBread\|talk]]) 11:27, 21 March 2016 (EDT)		The page [[Setting#Ferngill Republic\|Ferngill Republic]] has been created by [[User:JimmyProvince]], but there's no proof that the information is real, and they keep blanking the talk page after asking for credible sources. [[User:TurkeyInFrenchBread\|TurkeyInFrenchBread]] ([[User talk:TurkeyInFrenchBread\|talk]]) 11:27, 21 March 2016 (EDT)
	:Taken care of! [[User:Oath2order\|Oath2order]] ([[User talk:Oath2order\|talk]]) 21:46, 23 March 2016 (EDT)		:Taken care of! [[User:Oath2order\|Oath2order]] ([[User talk:Oath2order\|talk]]) 21:46, 23 March 2016 (EDT)

imported>Margotbean: remove redlink

2021-12-13T22:01:41Z

remove redlink

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 13 December 2021
Line 599:		Line 599:

	== Syntax highlighting is broken ==		== Syntax highlighting is broken ==
	Recently the <samp><source></samp> tag no longer recognises any language (including <samp>c#</samp> and <samp>javascript</samp>), and pages using the tag are listed in ~~[[:~~Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>		Recently the <samp><source></samp> tag no longer recognises any language (including <samp>c#</samp> and <samp>javascript</samp>), and pages using the tag are listed in '''Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors'''. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
	:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)		:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

imported>Margotbean: Text replacement - "tt>" to "samp>"

2021-11-04T18:49:06Z

Text replacement - "tt>" to "samp>"

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 4 November 2021
Line 543:		Line 543:
	});		});
	</syntaxhighlight>		</syntaxhighlight>
	(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js\|your <tt>common.js</tt> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>		(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js\|your <samp>common.js</samp> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>
	:+1 for adding this (to all languages) [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)		:+1 for adding this (to all languages) [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
	:: I've added this for all languages - thanks!! [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 13:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)		:: I've added this for all languages - thanks!! [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 13:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Line 599:		Line 599:

	== Syntax highlighting is broken ==		== Syntax highlighting is broken ==
	Recently the <tt><source></tt> tag no longer recognises any language (including <tt>c#</tt> and <tt>javascript</tt>), and pages using the tag are listed in [[:Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>		Recently the <samp><source></samp> tag no longer recognises any language (including <samp>c#</samp> and <samp>javascript</samp>), and pages using the tag are listed in [[:Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
	:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)		:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Line 732:		Line 732:
	Anyone can show a list of changes to an article or talk page going back to the start: choose a list size, time interval, and proceed earlier or later at will. Not so with "recent changes". Yes, I understand "recent". But I've returned after a necessary absence of 3 weeks and can't get back very far in what must be a long list. In fact, in the past, I have been unable to see all the changes that occurred in the prior 12-18 hours or so, even showing the complete 500 changes allowed. So "recent" may require some interpretation, but the limit of 500 is absolute and, I would argue, too small. Is there some reason we cannot look further back? I find it hard to believe that there is no need at all (I have needed to), and I also find it hard to believe that there are so many occasions to want to look far back that it would introduce lookup problems or inefficiencies for the Wiki. Can the article look-back feature be turned on for recents? [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)		Anyone can show a list of changes to an article or talk page going back to the start: choose a list size, time interval, and proceed earlier or later at will. Not so with "recent changes". Yes, I understand "recent". But I've returned after a necessary absence of 3 weeks and can't get back very far in what must be a long list. In fact, in the past, I have been unable to see all the changes that occurred in the prior 12-18 hours or so, even showing the complete 500 changes allowed. So "recent" may require some interpretation, but the limit of 500 is absolute and, I would argue, too small. Is there some reason we cannot look further back? I find it hard to believe that there is no need at all (I have needed to), and I also find it hard to believe that there are so many occasions to want to look far back that it would introduce lookup problems or inefficiencies for the Wiki. Can the article look-back feature be turned on for recents? [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

	: The actual limit is much higher than shown in the UI. Click 500, then change <tt>&limit=500</tt> in the URL to a higher number to see more. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 03:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)</small>		: The actual limit is much higher than shown in the UI. Click 500, then change <samp>&limit=500</samp> in the URL to a higher number to see more. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 03:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)</small>

	::Aha! Never noticed that in the URL before. The default one doesn't have it. Thanks! Browsing is like foraging, I guess. ;) [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)		::Aha! Never noticed that in the URL before. The default one doesn't have it. Thanks! Browsing is like foraging, I guess. ;) [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

imported>Margotbean: Text replacement - "
" to "
"

2021-10-25T23:51:05Z

Text replacement - "<br>" to "<br />"

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 25 October 2021
Line 125:		Line 125:
	:Example: ''"What is the second digit of the number five hundred twenty-three million seventy-four thousand eight hundred fifty-six?"'' and I answer with '''"5"'''.		:Example: ''"What is the second digit of the number five hundred twenty-three million seventy-four thousand eight hundred fifty-six?"'' and I answer with '''"5"'''.
	I have also tried writing out the number in word form as well doing reverse order of the digit (in this case, I would answer "2"). What gives? [[User:Kektklik\|Kektklik]] ([[User talk:Kektklik\|talk]]) 04:43, 20 October 2016 (BST)		I have also tried writing out the number in word form as well doing reverse order of the digit (in this case, I would answer "2"). What gives? [[User:Kektklik\|Kektklik]] ([[User talk:Kektklik\|talk]]) 04:43, 20 October 2016 (BST)
	::I realize I'm not an admin, but I can answer this question. In the example ''one hundred twenty-three million, four hundred fifty-six thousand, seven hundred eighty-nine (123,456,789)'', the first digit is the number "1."<br>In other words, the first digit is the number on the far left (furthest away from the decimal point), while the ninth digit is the number on the far right (closest to the decimal point).<br>In the example you provided above<br>''What is the second digit of the number five hundred twenty-three million seventy-four thousand eight hundred fifty-six?''<br>the correct answer is the number "'''2'''" (just type the single digit '''2''' as the answer) --[[User:NibKing\|NibKing]] ([[User talk:NibKing\|talk]]) 13:50, 20 October 2016 (BST)		::I realize I'm not an admin, but I can answer this question. In the example ''one hundred twenty-three million, four hundred fifty-six thousand, seven hundred eighty-nine (123,456,789)'', the first digit is the number "1."<br />In other words, the first digit is the number on the far left (furthest away from the decimal point), while the ninth digit is the number on the far right (closest to the decimal point).<br />In the example you provided above<br />''What is the second digit of the number five hundred twenty-three million seventy-four thousand eight hundred fifty-six?''<br />the correct answer is the number "'''2'''" (just type the single digit '''2''' as the answer) --[[User:NibKing\|NibKing]] ([[User talk:NibKing\|talk]]) 13:50, 20 October 2016 (BST)

	== Plums are now fruit ==		== Plums are now fruit ==

imported>Margotbean at 14:43, 19 March 2021

2021-03-19T14:43:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 19 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{archive header\|previous label = previous discussions [https://stardewcommunitywiki.com/Stardew_Valley_Wiki:Admin_noticeboard from the old wiki]}}~~

	== Capcha verification for posting talk discussion with links not working. ==		== Capcha verification for posting talk discussion with links not working. ==

imported>Margotbean: Protected "Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive Feb 2021": Archived page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2021-03-19T14:42:56Z

Protected "Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive Feb 2021": Archived page ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:42, 19 March 2021
(No difference)

imported>Margotbean: Margotbean moved page Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archives/2021-02 to Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive Feb 2021 without leaving a redirect: double slash in name is creating redlink

2021-03-19T14:40:29Z

Margotbean moved page Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archives/2021-02 to Stardew Valley Wiki:Admin noticeboard/Archive Feb 2021 without leaving a redirect: double slash in name is creating redlink

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:40, 19 March 2021
(No difference)

imported>Margotbean: fix syntax highlighting error

2021-03-09T21:26:50Z

fix syntax highlighting error

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 9 March 2021
Line 536:		Line 536:

	When a page has collapsible elements, section links often break because the page jumps away after JavaScript loads ([[Abigail#Eight Hearts\|see example]]). [https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/11/chrome-now-uses-scroll-anchoring-to-prevent-those-annoying-page-jumps/ Chrome has a feature to fix that], but other browsers like Firefox don't. I suggest adding this snippet to [[MediaWiki:Common.js]], which just moves the page back to the linked section after JavaScript is loaded:		When a page has collapsible elements, section links often break because the page jumps away after JavaScript loads ([[Abigail#Eight Hearts\|see example]]). [https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/11/chrome-now-uses-scroll-anchoring-to-prevent-those-annoying-page-jumps/ Chrome has a feature to fix that], but other browsers like Firefox don't. I suggest adding this snippet to [[MediaWiki:Common.js]], which just moves the page back to the linked section after JavaScript is loaded:
	<~~source~~ lang="javascript">		<syntaxhighlight lang="javascript">
	$(function() {		$(function() {
	if (location.hash) {		if (location.hash) {
Line 544:		Line 544:
	}		}
	});		});
	</~~source~~>		</syntaxhighlight>
	(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js\|your <tt>common.js</tt> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>		(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js\|your <tt>common.js</tt> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>
	:+1 for adding this (to all languages) [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)		:+1 for adding this (to all languages) [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 1 January 2023
Line 961:		Line 961:
	The difference becomes well-noticable in the [[Animals]] section about Cat or Dog.		The difference becomes well-noticable in the [[Animals]] section about Cat or Dog.
	Stardew Valley is a game with pixel graphics, after all.		Stardew Valley is a game with pixel graphics, after all.

			[[Category:Archived pages]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 4 November 2021
Line 543:		Line 543:
	});		});
	</syntaxhighlight>		</syntaxhighlight>
	(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js\|your <tt>common.js</tt> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>		(You can try the snippet by adding it to [[Special:MyPage/common.js\|your <samp>common.js</samp> subpage]].) —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 17:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)</small>
	:+1 for adding this (to all languages) [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)		:+1 for adding this (to all languages) [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 21:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
	:: I've added this for all languages - thanks!! [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 13:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)		:: I've added this for all languages - thanks!! [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 13:00, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Line 599:		Line 599:

	== Syntax highlighting is broken ==		== Syntax highlighting is broken ==
	Recently the <tt><source></tt> tag no longer recognises any language (including <tt>c#</tt> and <tt>javascript</tt>), and pages using the tag are listed in [[:Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>		Recently the <samp><source></samp> tag no longer recognises any language (including <samp>c#</samp> and <samp>javascript</samp>), and pages using the tag are listed in [[:Category:Pages with syntax highlighting errors]]. Is it possible the extension wasn't installed correctly on the new server? —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 19:31, 11 July 2019 (UTC)</small>
	:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)		:Thanks for the report - this should be resolved now! -- [[User:Katzeus\|Katzeus]] ([[User talk:Katzeus\|talk]]) 10:03, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Line 732:		Line 732:
	Anyone can show a list of changes to an article or talk page going back to the start: choose a list size, time interval, and proceed earlier or later at will. Not so with "recent changes". Yes, I understand "recent". But I've returned after a necessary absence of 3 weeks and can't get back very far in what must be a long list. In fact, in the past, I have been unable to see all the changes that occurred in the prior 12-18 hours or so, even showing the complete 500 changes allowed. So "recent" may require some interpretation, but the limit of 500 is absolute and, I would argue, too small. Is there some reason we cannot look further back? I find it hard to believe that there is no need at all (I have needed to), and I also find it hard to believe that there are so many occasions to want to look far back that it would introduce lookup problems or inefficiencies for the Wiki. Can the article look-back feature be turned on for recents? [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)		Anyone can show a list of changes to an article or talk page going back to the start: choose a list size, time interval, and proceed earlier or later at will. Not so with "recent changes". Yes, I understand "recent". But I've returned after a necessary absence of 3 weeks and can't get back very far in what must be a long list. In fact, in the past, I have been unable to see all the changes that occurred in the prior 12-18 hours or so, even showing the complete 500 changes allowed. So "recent" may require some interpretation, but the limit of 500 is absolute and, I would argue, too small. Is there some reason we cannot look further back? I find it hard to believe that there is no need at all (I have needed to), and I also find it hard to believe that there are so many occasions to want to look far back that it would introduce lookup problems or inefficiencies for the Wiki. Can the article look-back feature be turned on for recents? [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

	: The actual limit is much higher than shown in the UI. Click 500, then change <tt>&limit=500</tt> in the URL to a higher number to see more. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 03:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)</small>		: The actual limit is much higher than shown in the UI. Click 500, then change <samp>&limit=500</samp> in the URL to a higher number to see more. —<small>[[User:Pathoschild\|Pathoschild]] ([[User talk:Pathoschild\|talk]]) 03:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)</small>

	::Aha! Never noticed that in the URL before. The default one doesn't have it. Thanks! Browsing is like foraging, I guess. ;) [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)		::Aha! Never noticed that in the URL before. The default one doesn't have it. Thanks! Browsing is like foraging, I guess. ;) [[User:Butterbur\|Butterbur]] ([[User talk:Butterbur\|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)