Talk:Friendship - Revision history

imported>ChloeCat at 16:21, 5 March 2026

2026-03-05T16:21:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 5 March 2026
Line 157:		Line 157:
	I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)		I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
	:The code that gives -2 points to non-romanceable NPCs still runs when dating, so you get a -8 and then a -2 for -10 total (and for that matter, you also get the -2 when married and below 10 hearts, for a resultant -14 instead of -13, which the page totally fails to mention). --[[User:Wikonimo\|Wikonimo]] ([[User talk:Wikonimo\|talk]]) 10:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)		:The code that gives -2 points to non-romanceable NPCs still runs when dating, so you get a -8 and then a -2 for -10 total (and for that matter, you also get the -2 when married and below 10 hearts, for a resultant -14 instead of -13, which the page totally fails to mention). --[[User:Wikonimo\|Wikonimo]] ([[User talk:Wikonimo\|talk]]) 10:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

			Ah, I see that you're right! Thanks for pointing that out. While looking back at that, I also noticed something really interesting that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere. I believe you lose 10 points with your spouse (but actually 34% less than that of course) when there is a monster in your house, but specifically only after you kill it. That's really funny. It's in Farmhouse.cs, in its UpdateWhenCurrentLocation function. [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 16:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

imported>Wikonimo: /* Dating decay rate & Spouse modifier */

2026-03-05T10:05:04Z

Dating decay rate & Spouse modifier

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 5 March 2026
Line 156:		Line 156:

	I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)		I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
			:The code that gives -2 points to non-romanceable NPCs still runs when dating, so you get a -8 and then a -2 for -10 total (and for that matter, you also get the -2 when married and below 10 hearts, for a resultant -14 instead of -13, which the page totally fails to mention). --[[User:Wikonimo\|Wikonimo]] ([[User talk:Wikonimo\|talk]]) 10:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

imported>ChloeCat at 01:25, 5 March 2026

2026-03-05T01:25:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 5 March 2026
Line 151:		Line 151:
	This is false. When you get engaged/married, other romanceable characters' heart meters do not "convert behavior." They continue to have a maximum of 8 hearts unless you give them a bouquet, which unlocks their last two hearts. I tried removing this line and explained that it was inaccurate information, but the change was reverted. This should be removed, as it is causing confusion and spreading misinformation. ''Unsigned post by [[User:SourStrawberry\|SourStrawberry]] 4 February 2025''		This is false. When you get engaged/married, other romanceable characters' heart meters do not "convert behavior." They continue to have a maximum of 8 hearts unless you give them a bouquet, which unlocks their last two hearts. I tried removing this line and explained that it was inaccurate information, but the change was reverted. This should be removed, as it is causing confusion and spreading misinformation. ''Unsigned post by [[User:SourStrawberry\|SourStrawberry]] 4 February 2025''
	:I have changed the wording to avoid reference to non-marriage candidates. Please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 14:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)		:I have changed the wording to avoid reference to non-marriage candidates. Please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 14:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

			== Dating decay rate & Spouse modifier ==
			Is there a source for the decay rate while dating and non-maxed being -10/day? I'm seeing "changeFriendship(-8, n);" (decay of 8 points per day) in the game code, in Farmer.cs. (Unless that was changed in the most recent versions; I'm looking at 1.6 code rather than 1.6.15.)

			I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

imported>Margotbean at 14:18, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T14:18:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 4 February 2025
Line 149:		Line 149:
	"When you propose marriage, the heart meters of all other marriage candidates convert to the behavior of all other villagers, since none are marriage candidates any longer."		"When you propose marriage, the heart meters of all other marriage candidates convert to the behavior of all other villagers, since none are marriage candidates any longer."

	This is false. When you get engaged/married, other romanceable characters' heart meters do not "convert behavior." They continue to have a maximum of 8 hearts unless you give them a bouquet, which unlocks their last two hearts. I tried removing this line and explained that it was inaccurate information, but the change was reverted. This should be removed, as it is causing confusion and spreading misinformation.		This is false. When you get engaged/married, other romanceable characters' heart meters do not "convert behavior." They continue to have a maximum of 8 hearts unless you give them a bouquet, which unlocks their last two hearts. I tried removing this line and explained that it was inaccurate information, but the change was reverted. This should be removed, as it is causing confusion and spreading misinformation. ''Unsigned post by [[User:SourStrawberry\|SourStrawberry]] 4 February 2025''
			:I have changed the wording to avoid reference to non-marriage candidates. Please remember to sign your posts with 4 tildes! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 14:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

imported>SourStrawberry: /* What is meant by this line? */ new section

2025-02-04T05:38:51Z

What is meant by this line?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:38, 4 February 2025
Line 144:		Line 144:
	[[User:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|Francis-Loves-Rasmodius]] ([[User talk:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|talk]]) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Francis-Loves-Rasmodius		[[User:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|Francis-Loves-Rasmodius]] ([[User talk:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|talk]]) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Francis-Loves-Rasmodius
	:The wiki isn't the main source of information about bugs, the official forums is the place to report bugs. This particular bug has been reported by several people here: https://forums.stardewvalley.net/threads/every-gift-is-registering-as-a-loved-gift.36355/ We hope for a fix soon! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 08:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)		:The wiki isn't the main source of information about bugs, the official forums is the place to report bugs. This particular bug has been reported by several people here: https://forums.stardewvalley.net/threads/every-gift-is-registering-as-a-loved-gift.36355/ We hope for a fix soon! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 08:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

			== What is meant by this line? ==

			"When you propose marriage, the heart meters of all other marriage candidates convert to the behavior of all other villagers, since none are marriage candidates any longer."

			This is false. When you get engaged/married, other romanceable characters' heart meters do not "convert behavior." They continue to have a maximum of 8 hearts unless you give them a bouquet, which unlocks their last two hearts. I tried removing this line and explained that it was inaccurate information, but the change was reverted. This should be removed, as it is causing confusion and spreading misinformation.

imported>Margotbean at 08:21, 25 January 2025

2025-01-25T08:21:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 25 January 2025
Line 143:		Line 143:
	thank you!! sorry!!!		thank you!! sorry!!!
	[[User:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|Francis-Loves-Rasmodius]] ([[User talk:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|talk]]) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Francis-Loves-Rasmodius		[[User:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|Francis-Loves-Rasmodius]] ([[User talk:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|talk]]) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Francis-Loves-Rasmodius
			:The wiki isn't the main source of information about bugs, the official forums is the place to report bugs. This particular bug has been reported by several people here: https://forums.stardewvalley.net/threads/every-gift-is-registering-as-a-loved-gift.36355/ We hope for a fix soon! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 08:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

imported>Francis-Loves-Rasmodius: /* glitch where everything is loved? */ new section

2025-01-24T18:15:26Z

glitch where everything is loved?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 24 January 2025
Line 136:		Line 136:
	:::That was several versions ago, I don't know if it still works the same. I haven't been able to spend that much time on one piece of code in, well, several years.		:::That was several versions ago, I don't know if it still works the same. I haven't been able to spend that much time on one piece of code in, well, several years.
	:::I'm not sure if anything written on the wiki could replace all that mental work, but the modding section would be the place to elaborate, if you do find the words to make it more clear. Best of luck!! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 20:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)		:::I'm not sure if anything written on the wiki could replace all that mental work, but the modding section would be the place to elaborate, if you do find the words to make it more clear. Best of luck!! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 20:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

			== glitch where everything is loved? ==

			hi!! i'm sorry if I format this wrong this is my first time commenting I think
			there's currently a glitch on Nintendo switch's Stardew valley, specifically in version 1.6.9.40 I think, which makes it so every single giftable item is loved by every single villager. is there information about this anywhere on the wiki? I can't find any mention of it.
			thank you!! sorry!!!
			[[User:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|Francis-Loves-Rasmodius]] ([[User talk:Francis-Loves-Rasmodius\|talk]]) 18:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC) Francis-Loves-Rasmodius

imported>Margotbean at 20:51, 23 June 2024

2024-06-23T20:51:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 23 June 2024
Line 133:		Line 133:
	{{clear}}		{{clear}}
	::Though "true universals" needs explanation, my intention would be to clarify how these 9 items would behave differently with conflicts as described [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|here]]. But after reading your post, I will concede that this distinction is possibly better noted at [[Modding:Gift_taste_data]], or somewhere similar, instead of here. This page is meant for players, not modders and it succeeds in communicating a very complex system succinctly so I'm hesitant to add clutter to it. Regardless of whether this change could be implemented here in some form or if it would be better suggested elsewhere, thank you again for your time, I really appreciate it. [[User:Puppershuffle\|Puppershuffle]] ([[User talk:Puppershuffle\|talk]]) 18:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)		::Though "true universals" needs explanation, my intention would be to clarify how these 9 items would behave differently with conflicts as described [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|here]]. But after reading your post, I will concede that this distinction is possibly better noted at [[Modding:Gift_taste_data]], or somewhere similar, instead of here. This page is meant for players, not modders and it succeeds in communicating a very complex system succinctly so I'm hesitant to add clutter to it. Regardless of whether this change could be implemented here in some form or if it would be better suggested elsewhere, thank you again for your time, I really appreciate it. [[User:Puppershuffle\|Puppershuffle]] ([[User talk:Puppershuffle\|talk]]) 18:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
			:::You're welcome!! Looking over the gift taste code is how I got started on this wiki... Even before there was a modding section, sometime around v1.11, I looked at the gifting code for about 3 weeks trying to understand it. I didn't "get it" until I was able to step through the code. I saw that changing Haley's hate entry to include both item id 74 (Prismatic Shard) and category -2 had the net effect of cancelling each other out, and she loved the Prismatic Shard then. Kind of blew my mind...
			:::That was several versions ago, I don't know if it still works the same. I haven't been able to spend that much time on one piece of code in, well, several years.
			:::I'm not sure if anything written on the wiki could replace all that mental work, but the modding section would be the place to elaborate, if you do find the words to make it more clear. Best of luck!! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 20:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

imported>Puppershuffle: /* Universal Neutral Clarification */

2024-06-23T18:52:13Z

Universal Neutral Clarification

@@ Line 104: / Line 104: @@
 * 4 Sell to Willy (-23): [[Coral]], [[Nautilus Shell]], [[Roe]], [[Squid Ink]]
 * 1 Syrup/Misc Artisan Goods (-27): [[Mystic Syrup]]
-I would guess these items are included in [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals|Universal Neutrals]] as a solution to cluttered Neutral tables. If an item goes unmentioned by Universal or NPC gift tastes, [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined|<code>NPC::getGiftTasteForThisItem</code>]] spits out Neutral. My assumption is the logic goes like this: if there are fewer exceptions (i.e. fewer NPCs who love, hate, like, dislike these 9) than the amount of times it needs referencing (i.e. the NPCs for whom they're neutral by default), then why not make it a rule and simplify however many categories to "'''All [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals|Universal Neutrals]]'''."<br>Is this assumption correct? To clarify why I ask, imagine an NPC who ''loves'' [[Minerals#Gems|Gems]] (-2). They would only ''like'' [[Diamond]] (72) because a Universal Item ID taste overrides NPC Category taste. So, do these nine items act like [[Diamond]] by some [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined|shenanigans]] or are they listed as [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals|Universal Neutrals]] because they are commonly-neutral-and-hard-to-organize-items? If I've missed something in the [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined|code]] (perhaps related to edibility and price), I would be very interested to know. If I'm correct, then some kind of distinction on the page would be appreciated. I'd be more than happy to provide suggestions if desired. Thank you for your time. --[[User:Puppershuffle|Puppershuffle]] ([[User talk:Puppershuffle|talk]]) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
+I would guess these items are included in [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals|Universal Neutrals]] as a solution to cluttered Neutral tables. If an item goes unmentioned by Universal or NPC gift tastes, [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined|<code>NPC::getGiftTasteForThisItem</code>]] spits out Neutral. My assumption is the logic goes like this: if there are fewer exceptions (i.e. fewer NPCs who love, hate, like, dislike these 9) than the amount of times it needs referencing (i.e. the NPCs for whom they're neutral by default), then why not make it a rule and simplify however many categories to "'''All [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals|Universal Neutrals]]'''."<br>Is this assumption correct? To clarify why I ask, imagine an NPC who ''loves'' [[Minerals#Gems|Gems]] (-2). They would only ''like'' [[Diamond]] (72) because a Universal Item ID taste overrides NPC Category taste. So, do these nine items act like [[Diamond]] by some [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined|shenanigans]] or are they listed as [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals|Universal Neutrals]] because they are commonly-neutral-and-hard-to-organize-items? If I've missed something in the [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined|code]] (perhaps related to edibility and price), I would be very interested to know. If I'm correct, then some kind of distinction on the page would be appreciated. I'd be more than happy to provide suggestions if desired. Thank you for your time. [[User:Puppershuffle|Puppershuffle]] ([[User talk:Puppershuffle|talk]]) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 :I'm not sure what you're asking, in all honesty. Classification of gifts as universals on the wiki started with the code, but it was looked over by a human, and if an item happens to be hated by everyone (or neutral to everyone), then it's classified as a universal on the wiki. So, you are correct in thinking that if a majority of NPCs happen to feel neutral towards an item, it's classified as a universal with exceptions on the wiki, without regard to whatever hoops the code jumps through.
 :The gifting code has been rewritten several times, and I think it's still incredibly obfuscated. But it works the way ConcernedApe wants it to. There's no rhyme or reason, except what CA wanted gift tastes to be.
 :I hope this helps somewhat. Please feel free to comment back if you want to clarify further! [[User:Margotbean|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean|talk]]) 07:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

imported>Margotbean: /* Universal Neutral Clarification */

2024-06-23T07:21:56Z

Universal Neutral Clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:21, 23 June 2024
Line 105:		Line 105:
	* 1 Syrup/Misc Artisan Goods (-27): [[Mystic Syrup]]		* 1 Syrup/Misc Artisan Goods (-27): [[Mystic Syrup]]
	I would guess these items are included in [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals\|Universal Neutrals]] as a solution to cluttered Neutral tables. If an item goes unmentioned by Universal or NPC gift tastes, [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|<code>NPC::getGiftTasteForThisItem</code>]] spits out Neutral. My assumption is the logic goes like this: if there are fewer exceptions (i.e. fewer NPCs who love, hate, like, dislike these 9) than the amount of times it needs referencing (i.e. the NPCs for whom they're neutral by default), then why not make it a rule and simplify however many categories to "'''All [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals\|Universal Neutrals]]'''."<br>Is this assumption correct? To clarify why I ask, imagine an NPC who ''loves'' [[Minerals#Gems\|Gems]] (-2). They would only ''like'' [[Diamond]] (72) because a Universal Item ID taste overrides NPC Category taste. So, do these nine items act like [[Diamond]] by some [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|shenanigans]] or are they listed as [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals\|Universal Neutrals]] because they are commonly-neutral-and-hard-to-organize-items? If I've missed something in the [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|code]] (perhaps related to edibility and price), I would be very interested to know. If I'm correct, then some kind of distinction on the page would be appreciated. I'd be more than happy to provide suggestions if desired. Thank you for your time. --[[User:Puppershuffle\|Puppershuffle]] ([[User talk:Puppershuffle\|talk]]) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)		I would guess these items are included in [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals\|Universal Neutrals]] as a solution to cluttered Neutral tables. If an item goes unmentioned by Universal or NPC gift tastes, [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|<code>NPC::getGiftTasteForThisItem</code>]] spits out Neutral. My assumption is the logic goes like this: if there are fewer exceptions (i.e. fewer NPCs who love, hate, like, dislike these 9) than the amount of times it needs referencing (i.e. the NPCs for whom they're neutral by default), then why not make it a rule and simplify however many categories to "'''All [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals\|Universal Neutrals]]'''."<br>Is this assumption correct? To clarify why I ask, imagine an NPC who ''loves'' [[Minerals#Gems\|Gems]] (-2). They would only ''like'' [[Diamond]] (72) because a Universal Item ID taste overrides NPC Category taste. So, do these nine items act like [[Diamond]] by some [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|shenanigans]] or are they listed as [[Friendship#Universal_Neutrals\|Universal Neutrals]] because they are commonly-neutral-and-hard-to-organize-items? If I've missed something in the [[Modding:Gift_taste_data#How_a_gift_taste_is_determined\|code]] (perhaps related to edibility and price), I would be very interested to know. If I'm correct, then some kind of distinction on the page would be appreciated. I'd be more than happy to provide suggestions if desired. Thank you for your time. --[[User:Puppershuffle\|Puppershuffle]] ([[User talk:Puppershuffle\|talk]]) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
			:I'm not sure what you're asking, in all honesty. Classification of gifts as universals on the wiki started with the code, but it was looked over by a human, and if an item happens to be hated by everyone (or neutral to everyone), then it's classified as a universal on the wiki. So, you are correct in thinking that if a majority of NPCs happen to feel neutral towards an item, it's classified as a universal with exceptions on the wiki, without regard to whatever hoops the code jumps through.
			:The gifting code has been rewritten several times, and I think it's still incredibly obfuscated. But it works the way ConcernedApe wants it to. There's no rhyme or reason, except what CA wanted gift tastes to be.
			:I hope this helps somewhat. Please feel free to comment back if you want to clarify further! [[User:Margotbean\|margotbean]] ([[User talk:Margotbean\|talk]]) 07:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 5 March 2026
Line 157:		Line 157:
	I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)		I think the 34% reduction in spouse heart gain/loss should also be noted on the Marriage page, and the spouse-specific values (kissing your spouse and married decay rate) should also clarify that those are pre-reduction values that will never actually apply (i.e. kissing your spouse will never actually give 10 points because spouses are inherently affected by the 34% reduction, and same for married decay). [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 01:25, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
	:The code that gives -2 points to non-romanceable NPCs still runs when dating, so you get a -8 and then a -2 for -10 total (and for that matter, you also get the -2 when married and below 10 hearts, for a resultant -14 instead of -13, which the page totally fails to mention). --[[User:Wikonimo\|Wikonimo]] ([[User talk:Wikonimo\|talk]]) 10:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)		:The code that gives -2 points to non-romanceable NPCs still runs when dating, so you get a -8 and then a -2 for -10 total (and for that matter, you also get the -2 when married and below 10 hearts, for a resultant -14 instead of -13, which the page totally fails to mention). --[[User:Wikonimo\|Wikonimo]] ([[User talk:Wikonimo\|talk]]) 10:05, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

			Ah, I see that you're right! Thanks for pointing that out. While looking back at that, I also noticed something really interesting that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere. I believe you lose 10 points with your spouse (but actually 34% less than that of course) when there is a monster in your house, but specifically only after you kill it. That's really funny. It's in Farmhouse.cs, in its UpdateWhenCurrentLocation function. [[User:ChloeCat\|ChloeCat]] ([[User talk:ChloeCat\|talk]]) 16:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)