User talk:Margotbean
| This is Margotbean's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Margotbean. | |
|---|---|
|
|
Archived pages
- Archived discussions 2021 (Feb - Dec)
- Archived discussions 2022
- Archived discussions 2023
- Archived discussions 2024
- Archived discussions 2025
Standardization of sources in items pages
Usually the fisrt paragraph in any item page is where it can be obtained, some items only have 1 source while other have 10+, those with many sources result in a vey confusing and slow to read paragraph making it very hard to find each specific source. In some pages, the sources are in a list from (e.g. Red Mushroom), while others are not (e.g. Emerald). I think the list format is much better and, in my opinion, should be the standard for items with many sources. I am open to work on this standardization if you agree with me Klytos (talk) 18:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- My goodness, you do like to jump from one project to another! In this case, items with few sources are listed in paragraph form, and when the paragraph gets too long or cumbersome, a list format can be adopted. There is no need to apply a standard to all pages without regard to content! Thank you, margotbean (talk) 19:06, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Redirect pages
Hello Margotbean! I recently noticed that the farm maps redirect pages were really inconsistent, you could be redirected to the beach farm accesing "Beach Farm" but not "Beach Farm Map", and you couldn't be redirected to the hilltop farm accesing "Hiltop Farm", only "Hilltop Farm Map". In this example, some farm maps were only redirected if the page had "Map" in it and some if it didn't. To fix that I added redirect pages for all farm types with both "Map" in the title and not, adding the missing ones, only to be reverted by you.
Presented my argument could you please give a second thought on the pages? Maybe leaving only the ones without "Map", or with it, you decide. Thank you for your time Klytos (talk) 22:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Removed note on Crab Pot page.
You removed a note on the crab pot page without proper justification. There is no possible way to cite the precise amount of time taken, as it is highly variable depending on various ingame conditions.
I will restore it in 24 hours if you don't have a compelling reason not to.
I also kinda wanna note that the majority of current citations are either completely useless(because they don't actually reference anything the average player can access) or actively inaccurate, because various ingame conditions modify them. That being said, I did actually test the crab pot time ingame with 230 crab pots, and averaged around 40 extra minutes(compared to 90 normally).
The entire wiki's citation method needs a serious rework.
DemiserofD (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- The note consisted of advice-giving and was inappropriate to add in the first place. margotbean (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Asking Questions
Hello, this is Jae Yoon Park.
I have a question to you.
On March 5th, 2025, Magma Sparker(Korean Page) was changed by you, and I tried to contact to you for a reason why it was changed.
To be exact, just to hear the reason. No anger, no conflict, not seeking fights.
Just asking questions.
Since I really love this game so I could give some hands for wiki pages especially Korean page.
But my work was not applied some works. Like changing gif file to none.
Was it the file size taking too much on it? or was it un nessesary for doing it? or was it some reason that needed to be change because of bug?
If you change some work without saying, I don't know which one should I change, improve or cautionus other pages.
With sincerely, Jae Yoon Park.
In case of lost contact, here's my email number for it, jaeyoonpark.bba@gmail.com
xhaktm1226 (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hello! Your change was reverted because it was inconsistent with the other monsters pages. The Magma Sparker page has an animated .gif for the Magma Sparker, and the variations use Template:Name, with static .png files.
- Going forward, just look at similar pages within a type (other monsters, other crops, other trees, etc.) to know how they should all look, and keep them consistent with each other. Thanks, margotbean (talk) 05:04, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
==
Hello, margotbean, I have read your message, Thank you!
seeing other pages, and now I knew I should be careful with the consistency with other pages. Thank you for your kind explanation.
In my opinion, it would be nice to have a .gif file, but I agree your words with the consistency.
Once, I start editing other things, I might ask to you a lot of things to you or other admins for asking question.
it would be tiring some, but I would love to help.
Thank you, margotbean.
xhaktm1226 (talk) 22:56, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Removed Meowmere info
Please explain why you reverted my edit to the Meowmere page. Not only did you remove information with no explanation, as though it were somehow self-evident why it should be removed, you also marked it as a minor edit, even though removal of information is not supposed to be labeled as a minor edit. -Jatopian (talk|contribs) 03:04, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello! The reasons the edit was reverted are:
- There is no punctuation, making the sentence a runon sentence
- The item has no relationship to the trivia bullet point it was added to
- The level of detail in describing the projectiles is excessive for the SDV wiki
- As for why the reversion was marked as minor: Mediawiki did that automatically. We are upgrading the mediawiki version, which should correct the problem. margotbean (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Permission as a regular user
Hi, I finished translation of the section "Fish size and quality" from English to German. The wiki won't allow me to publish it, because the edit size is too big: "Mass edit by new user". I can't post it on my user page either for preview. Thanks -- Vad (talk) 21:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello, please read Help:Editing#New Editor Restriction. Thank you, margotbean (talk) 00:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Wild Trees
The Mossy Seed explicitly refers to what the wiki currently has named "Green Rain Trees" as "Wild Trees." Since this is the canonical name for the trees, why was the page "Wild Tree" deleted?
Enchantment Details
My edits (new account, CouldBeAHamster, didn't remember this username until after making those edits) adding information on enchantments to the watering can page are not adding any unnecessary detail, and information on tool upgrades is already duplicated from the Blacksmith page. For consistency shouldn't each tool page either not contain that information (about tool upgrades and prices) covered by the Blacksmith page, or also cover the information about which enchantments can be applied to it which is only present on the Forge page?
Regardless, there should surely be at least a reference to the Forge's enchantment functionality in the opening paragraphs informing a viewer that each tool can be enchanted at the forge, so that one is informed about all pertinent information about a tool on its page.